Adoption of ChatGPT and other Artificial Intelligence among Physicians around the world: Barriers and the way-forward

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62497/IRABCS.2024.21

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, physicians, barriers, way-forward, chatgpt

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in modern society, revolutionizing various industries, including healthcare. ChatGPT, a language processing tool, has garnered significant attention for its ability to simulate human-like conversations and assist in a myriad of tasks. Despite its potential, the adoption of ChatGPT among physicians worldwide remains limited, particularly in regions like Asia, Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. This reluctance poses barriers to leveraging AI for novel diagnosis and treatment approaches, hindering progress in global healthcare. In this study, we explore the medical importance of AI, particularly ChatGPT, highlighting its potential to reduce medical errors and provide accurate healthcare information. However, concerns regarding bias, dependency, and plagiarism have surfaced, necessitating cautious integration and human oversight in its application. Recommendations include increasing awareness among physicians, implementing ethical guidelines, and utilizing AI-detecting software to mitigate risks. Furthermore, collaboration between international medical associations, policymakers, and governing bodies is essential to promoting AI adoption and ensuring its ethical use. While AI holds promise for advancing healthcare, its full potential hinges on overcoming current barriers and fostering a symbiotic relationship between technology and human expertise. Future research must address lingering uncertainties and ethical considerations to realize the transformative impact of AI in medicine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Ibad Ur Rehman, Shifa Tameer e Millat University, Islamabad

    Training Medical Officer (TMO) at Department of Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Shifa Tameer e Millat University, Islamabad

References

Openai.com. [cited 2023 Mar 30]. Available from: https://chat.openai.com/chat

Hao K. What is ChatGPT? What to know about the AI chatbot. Wall Street journal (Eastern ed) [Internet]. 2023 Feb 8 [cited 2023 Mar 31]; Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-ai-chatbot-app-explained-11675865177

Derico B, Kleinman Z. OpenAI announces ChatGPT successor GPT-4. BBC [Internet]. 2023 Mar 14 [cited 2023 Mar 31]; Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64959346

Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 28];25(1):44–56. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30617339/

Weintraub K. ChatGPT is poised to upend medical information. For better and worse. USA today [Internet]. 2023 Feb 26 [cited 2023 Mar 31]; Available from: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2023/02/26/chatgpt-medical-care-doctors/11253952002/

IBM Watson Health [Internet]. IBM Watson Health. [cited 2023 Mar 31]. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/watson-health

Yeo YH, Samaan JS, Ng WH, Ting P-S, Trivedi H, Vipani A, et al. Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. ClinMolHepatol [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 28]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36946005/

McGee RW. Is chat gpt biased against conservatives? An empirical study. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 6]; Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4359405

Sallam M, Salim N, Barakat M, Al-Tammemi A. ChatGPT applications in medical, dental, pharmacy, and public health education: A descriptive study highlighting the advantages and limitations. Narra J [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 6];3(1):e103. Available from: https://narraj.org/main/article/view/103

King MR, chatGPT. A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cell Mol Bioeng [Internet]. 2023;16(1):1–2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8

Gao CA, Howard FM, Markov NS, Dyer EC, Ramesh S, Luo Y, et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2022. p. 2022.12.23.521610. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/27/2022.12.23.521610.abstract

GPTZero [Internet]. Gptzero.me. [cited 2023 Apr 6]. Available from: https://gptzero.me/

Downloads

Published

07/02/2024

Issue

Section

Short Communications

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Khan DMM, Khan DMO, Ibad Ur Rehman. Adoption of ChatGPT and other Artificial Intelligence among Physicians around the world: Barriers and the way-forward. IRABCS [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 2 [cited 2024 Jul. 20];2(1):2-4. Available from: https://irabcs.com/ojs/article/view/21

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>